User talk:RaffiKojian

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

/archive /gardenology

Note from Raffi: Welcome to my talk page - if you're here to ask about the plant/garden photos, please read this first. This is a huge project to name and categorize the photos, then remove photos that are no longer necessary. Please help! Also, please note that it is important not to change the file names! The renaming of the files is complicated by renaming, and the natural order of the photos is interrupted, which helps with the naming and locations. If you have any questions, you may be better off emailing me (see the "Email this user" link in the toolbox), since I may not be checking this page frequently. Thanks! --RaffiKojian (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Move out of unidentified plants[edit]

Hi Raffi,

I will move lots of your images out of unidentified plants because they are clogging that category up a bit. The other reason is, that they are actually not unidentified. Most plants are identified (by the label) they are just missing a category so they are effectively in the wrong cat. The purpose of Unidentified plants cat is, that people with knowledge go through that and identify plants. The work which has to be done with your plants does not need any knowledge but just raw time and patientes so I don't want, that experts looking through the cat are not turend off by so many actually identified images. You do have also image which are really not identified because they are missing a label. Those images are fine in Unidentified plants. Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 09:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

nice image ;) . cheers, Amada44  talk to me 07:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, RaffiKojian!
Tip: Add categories to your images
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Andrei Sakharov-IMG 0887-raffi kojian.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your images of Shushi[edit]

Hello. I'm writing here to inform You that in one or more uploaded by You images of Shushi to the commons the name of the city and category were moved to Shusha. I've reverted such changes, if You want to express Your POV, it will be welcomed. Regards, --Ліонкінг Lion King 09:13, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting a photo in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use it in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the picture will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The photo which I would use is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gardenology.org-IMG_1975_rbgs11jan.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request… My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com

Bye,

Edoardo

Edoardo.bit (talk) 10:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Saroyan-armeniapedia 2283.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 14:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stepanakert-square-P1003098.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Interfase (talk) 14:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology-IMG 4877 hunt10mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DS (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ask permission for the photo "Mausoleum in Mamedbeyli"[edit]

I am writing on behalf of the Karabakh Foundation, a 501(c)3 cultural charity foundation that preserves and disseminates the cultural heritage and traditions of Azerbaijan, the Caucasus area, and the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan. I would like to request permission to use an image found on Wikipedia in an educational capacity. Specifically we request to use the images in an online educational exhibition entitled, Azerbaijan Artifacts, which presents information about coins, stamps, rug, architecture, and other artifacts related to Azerbaijan. In addition we would like permission to use the image in publicity related to the exhibition, on www.KarabakhFoundation.org, and eventually perhaps in a physical exhibition.

I am interested in using the images from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mausoleum_in_Mamedbeyli-IMG_8021.JPG, which called Mausoleum in Mamedbeyli. This image would perfectly help us convey the excellent of Azerbaijani nature and architecture. If this is acceptable, please let me know how to properly cite (by name, include website also, etc). If possible, I would also appreciate if you could send me high resolution copy of the image. Thank you for your help.

Please contact me: dygw11@gwmail.gwu.edu

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 7361 qsbg11mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 7574 qsbg11mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 12:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 0801 hunt07mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 2020 hunt09oct.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 0662 hunt07mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 1710 hunt09oct.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 23:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 1999 hunt09oct.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 15:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 0663 hunt07mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 2223 hunt0903.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Begonia umbraculifera[edit]

Hi, your File:Gardenology.org-IMG 1239 rbgs10dec.jpg doesn't look like the botanical drawing, nor to the type spécimens showing rounder leaves. Please can you make sure the species corresponds. It maybe a confusion of label in the garden. --Salix (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, thanks. In case it is a label mixing, I will continue my investigation Clin. --Salix (talk) 17:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Gardenology.org-IMG 0557 rbgs10dec.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 2724 rbgs11jan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 8215 rbgc10dec.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 1912 hunt09oct.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 1911 hunt09oct.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 19:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Begonia tenuifolia 1336.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Salix (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gardenology.org-IMG 4535 hunt0904.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Raffi-kojian 20180422 172316150.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Janapar Trail map[edit]

Hello Raffi, do you probably have a map of the Janapar Trail somewhere uploaded at commons? Something like this: https://www.facebook.com/janapar.trail/photos/475744295849779 even though it is outdated. Ofcouse if you have something more recent it is better then. I need it for the Russian article about Janapar Trail. Best regards. --Headgo (talk) 01:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RaffiKojian: , wondering where the Goodia is in the image, or did I miss something? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, sorry I did not add that category. I don't know anything about it. RaffiKojian (talk) 20:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks :-) Lotje (talk) 05:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Breaking consistency[edit]

There isn't a consensus established for a Basque model. The Basque region, an autonomous area of Spain, officially recognises alternate names alongside the Spanish ones. However, Azerbaijan doesn't follow this model. Please refer to my response on the Village Pump. It's necessary to establish a consensus before implementing such changes, as it would imply moving all village categories in Karabakh. — Golden talk 19:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will second that. There is no need to do anything in the next few days. Give this some time to try to reach a consensus on the VP, don't go plunging ahead without consensus. - Jmabel ! talk 20:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, and will you also please tell Golden the same thing? RaffiKojian (talk) 20:08, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]