User talk:AFBorchert

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Molas Pass in the Rocky Mountains


Comments, suggestions, and questions are welcome. Please open new sections here. This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 14 days with at least one signature end up here.

Kommentare, Anregungen und Fragen sind herzlich willkommen. Bitte neue Abschnitte unten anfügen. Diese Diskussionsseite wird von MiszaBot automatisch archiviert. Alle Abschnitte, die 14 Tage alt sind und mindestens eine Signatur haben, landen hier.

Apelación: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png[edit]

Hello, how are you, the reason for my appeal Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png I consider and insist is nothing more and nothing less than an update of the logo of the Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano, in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Movimiento revolucion ciudadana.png Explain why the image should be maintained, For this reason the reconsideration Alejandro Palacios Naspud (talk) 03:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Alejandro Palacios Naspud, thank you for asking. Both cases differ significantly, leading to different decisions by me as explained in my deletion rationales. In case of File:Movimiento revolucion ciudadana.png we have letters (are below COM:TOO) and the very simplified shape of a flame (also below COM:TOO in judgement of COM:TOO Andean Community and the cited case of the Saturn logo). In contrast to this, File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png has a far more complex flame, a torch, and a hand holding this. All this goes beyond COM:TOO and no case law is given which would allow me to divert that much from common COM:TOO thresholds. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 10:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]