Commons:Undeletion requests

Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Please read the instructions below, before requesting undeletion.

Enter a descriptive heading and press the button:

This is a dashboard widget.

Commons deletion (policy)

• Regular deletion (candidates)
  (Missing: 0 timestamps • 0 reasons • 0 subpages) • 0 malformed
• Speedy deletion (candidates)
  9 copyvios • 204 duplicates • 3 selfies • 64 others

---

• Media without a license
• Media without a source
• Media missing permission
• Orphaned talk pages

---

• Deletion log
• Undeletion requests

---

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

• You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
• If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
• If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
• If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use

* Wikipedia: als | ar | bar | bn | be | be-tarask | ca | el | en | et | eo | fa | fi | fr | frr | he | hr | hy | id | is | it | ja | lb | lt | lv | mk | ms | pt | ro | ru | sl | sr | th | tr | tt | uk | vi | zh | +/− Wikinews: en | no | pl | +/− Wikibooks: en | it | +/− Wikisource: fa | fr | +/− Wikiversity: en | +/− Wikivoyage: en | fa | fr | ru | zh | +/− Wikiquote (regarding images): he | +/− Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

• Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
• Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
• In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
• Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
• State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
• Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Closing discussions

In general, discussions should be closed only by administrators.

Instructions for administrators

Use common sense. If, for example, a file was deleted for missing a source, and the requesting user is the photographer, the file can be undeleted without further discussion. If the user wishes to tag a file with a certain license, you can do that for them if you want to, or leave it to them to do it. However, it is important that you remove any speedy deletion templates from the file. In general, try to comply with the requests of well-intending users. Files can, for example, be undeleted for the requesting user to look at without the request itself having to be closed. The deleting administrator may undelete the file if compelled by the arguments or information provided. The deleting administrator may also participate in the discussion. The deleting administrator should, however, not close contentious requests as "Not done." When a debate is settled, close it with a remark such as "Not done" or "Undeleted" and add the template {{Udelh}} above the header and the template {{Udelf}} below your own comment. (The templates are short for "undelete header" and "footer.") Closed requests are automatically archived. When undeleting a file, reference the discussion (for example "Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=nnnnnnnn#Heading"). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes should be tagged with {{Temporarily undeleted|transfer=yes}}. This places them into Temporarily undeleted files, a subcategory of Candidates for deletion, and automatically nominates them for speedy deletion after two days. Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion should be tagged with {{Temporarily undeleted}}. These are automatically nominated for speedy deletion after thirty days.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

undeletion request of Scot Nelson photos such as File:Fungal scab of rough lemon (9504944200).jpg

Not sure why so many photos by SCot Nelson were deleted, they are all covered under {{Cc-zero-Scot Nelson}} and you can see his PD release at https://www.flickr.com/people/scotnelson/ . @Jcb: am I missing something? please undelete them, they are a very good source of images for many species. --Awkwafaba (talk) 13:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 Support This deletion was on the technical ground that no license is stated in the file description. It appears at https://www.flickr.com/photos/scotnelson/9504944200 with CC-0. If you want other images from this source undeleted, please provide a list here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: is there a way to search for that? Off the top of my head though, I think these may be in the same boat:

• File:Bipolaris incurvata on kentia palm.jpg
• File:Asperisporium caricae on papaya leaf.jpg
• File:Asperisporium caricae on papaya fruit.jpg
• File:Agrocybe aff. procera.jpg
• File:Collar rot of papaya (Carica papaya).jpg

I'm sure there are more --Awkwafaba (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Also is:

• File:Fungal scab of rough lemon (9504930964).jpg

Awkwafaba (talk) 14:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

also File:Palm pink rot (5684807606).jpg Awkwafaba (talk) 14:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

---

 Done: License reviewed those that had the template there. If there are any more, feel free to request undeletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Носии од Бабуна.png, and many others

I'd like to request the undeletion of this, because unlike many of my previously deleted uploads, this is one of the few I took with my phone when I visited the Museum of Macedonia. Some like the [[1]] file remain undeleted, yet are from the same collection of photos I took while I was there

the 2 others that are also from my collection of photos that've been deleted are: File:Пишталки од с. Ѕвегор (Пијанец) и Двојанки од с. Шипковица (Радовишки Шоплук).png; File:Дудуци изложени во Музејот на Македонија.png

I think these is among the most reasonable ones, along with some manaki brothers uploads (many of his images have been uploaded here, consider giving these particular ones a chance):

File:Брачен пар од с. Железнец, Железник.png; File:Жени во невестински носии од Демир Хисар, Железник.png; File:Мајка со дете во носии од с. Цапари, Ѓаваткол.png; File:Семејство во носии од с. Цапари, Ѓаваткол.png; File:Семејство во носии од с. Дихово, Горните Битолски Села.png; File:Брачен пар во носии од Мариово.png; File:Семејство во носии од с. Буф, Леринско Поле.png

Finally, some files which I only hope will be undeleted:

it was taken in 1957; File:Млади мажи на собор во с. К'шање, Овче Поле (1936).png; File:Жители на с. К'шање, Овче Поле (1936).png; it was taken in 1930; it was taken in 1952; it was taken in 1940; it was taken in 1955; it was taken in 1985;

 it was taken in 1954;  it was taken in 1959

if I remember more, might make a final request later on (or maybe not, i don't know for sure)

Sincerely, Big ooga booga mf Big ooga booga mf (talk) 00:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Gino-Miso Products.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Gino-Miso Products.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gino-Miso Products.jpg for being derivative work, but the lower half seems fine. (COM:TOO) Is it okay for me I to upload a modified version? I was going to comment in the DR, but it was speedy deleted apparently. If it's debatable, please undelete temporarily to discuss, or maybe re-open the DR. whym (talk) 03:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

File:自転車文化センター.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:自転車文化センター.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Syced and I offered to modify File:自転車文化センター.jpg in Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Museum_figures_in_Japan in a way that removes copyrighted content in it. I think the file should be revision-deleted instead of being fully deleted (and I believe that was the consensus of the DR). whym (talk) 03:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

@Whym: , file has been temporarily undeleted so it can be modified. I deleted because no modification had been made. Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

@Abzeronow Thanks, I uploaded a modified version. Is that enough? whym (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

@Whym: Yes, in my opinion. I'll revdell the old version and if no one objects, I'll close this as done in 12 hours or so from now. Abzeronow (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Ricardo Gomes no seu F4.jpg

This photo “Ricardo Gomes no seu F4”, published on the Wikipedia page https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardo_Gomes_(piloto) is a legitimate property of Ricardo Gomes, having been previously published , free of charge and under free license, on social networks and through some sport media in news that concern Ricardo Gomes exclusively. The author authorized the publication of this photograph on the Wikipedia page https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardo_Gomes_(piloto) and authorized it to be used and distributed under under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license and the GFDL.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LKCOM (talk • contribs) 12:41, 11 October 2023‎ (UTC)

• Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

@LKCOM the file on the title doesn't exist. I think that you are referring to File:Ricardo_Gomes_Formula_4.jpg. Please ask the author of the photo to follows the instructions on COM:VRT. Notice that the copyright holder is in general the photographer and not the person being photographed. Günther Frager (talk) 13:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)  Oppose The deleted file is probably File:Ricardo Gomes Formula 4.jpg

1. Owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give one the right to freely license it as required here. That right almost always belongs to the photographer.
2. Letters of the sort above are not acceptable here -- they are far too easy to forge.
3. The letter above falls far short of an CC-BY-SA license. It is, for one thing, not irrevocable and says nothing about derivative works.
4. The letter ends "...under a free license and without commercial purposes." That is an NC license which we do not permit.

This could be restored if either (a) the actual photographer sends a free license using VRT or (b) Gomes sends a free license together with a copy of the written license from the actual photographer which authorizes Gomes to freely license the work.

Also note that your claim to have been the actual photographer is a serious violation of Commons rules, makes it hard to believe anything you say, and could lead to your being blocked from editing here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

File:United We Stand SC.jpg

The fair use reason that this was removed apply to other countries, this image is US based (US Virgin Islands.) Yoblyblob (talk) 18:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Commons does not allow non-free images under fair use (or fair dealing) rationales from any country (Commons:Fair use). They must be uploaded directly to other projects under their non-free image policy. It could possibly be uploaded to the English Wikipedia directly, for example. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)